Tuesday, 14 January 2020

The Camp Simba Strike: Implications for US policy in the Horn


Just as the US is looking to draw down it’s presence in Africa, al-Shabaab has made a bold attack that has left three Americans dead. So, what will be the effect on US security policy in the Horn of Africa?


On Sunday 5 January, just before dawn, militants from the Somalia-based terror group, al-Shabaab, launched an attack on Camp Simba, a shared US and Kenyan military base on the island of Manda near Lamu. After breaching the fence and allegedly destroying several military vehicles and aircraft, Kenyan troops managed to repulse the attack but not after several Kenyan soldiers and three US personnel, two contractors and one serving member, were killed.

It’s the first major attack against a US position in Kenya and therefore represents a significant escalation of activity, possibly a sign that al-Shabaab is entering an even more aggressive phase of their campaign. The last US casualty in Somalia was a Special Forces soldier killed in 2018 whilst assisting an African Union (AU) tactical mission in Somalia. Although that would have been a significant moment for the group, it was not the result of a highly planned operation such as this. This attack shows a coordinated effort to directly target US forces.


US drawdown in Africa


The audacious assault comes less than a month after The Pentagon announced the possibility of a major drawdown or even complete pullout of US military personnel throughout Africa (although that would focus more heavily on West Africa).

With Trump’s ‘America First’ policy and his insistence that the US take a back seat in ‘global policing’, the crucial US support in Somalia hangs in the balance. AMISOM (African Union Mission in Somalia) troops are heavily reliant on both US Special Forces training and on key air support from US drones and aircraft. Without that support, it is likely that the AU’s attempt to contain al-Shabaab will falter.

The position of the AU


The AMISOM presence itself was supposed to end in 2019 but was extended for one year to support stability before Somali elections in 2020. Whether it will be extended again remains to be seen, but with the possibility of AU troop withdrawals and a US drawdown on men and equipment, the likelihood for a major al-Shabaab resurgence in 2020 has increased.

Then there is also the geopolitical competition in the region to consider. Nations such as the UAE, Turkey, Qatar, China and others are jostling for influence in the crucial area that overlooks shipping through the Red Sea. A US withdrawal would leave a vacuum in support for the Somali government in their struggle against al-Shabaab and a rise in influence in the region for whoever should step in to provide it.

A US response


However, the death of the US personnel as a result of a direct attack could also mark a small but crucial marker in the US fight against al-Shabaab. There is a possibility that this loss will drive many in the Pentagon to seek a bolstering of their presence in the Horn, both to counter the insurgents and to fend off any rivalry from the other players.

The real question is: will an erratic and unpredictable commander-in-chief in the form of Trump be swayed by his generals on the one hand or the ghosts of Afghanistan and the infamous Battle for Mogadishu in 1993 (in which 18 Americans were killed) on the other.

The beginnings of a new strategy


In the meantime, the Camp Simba attack is being touted as a victory by al- Shabaab and in the aftermath, US reaction is crucial. What is certain is that 2020, with Somali elections, a possible US drawdown, the end of the AU mission and the increasing jostling of foreign powers, will be a hugely important year for al-Shabaab’s strategy. Perhaps we have just seen the first step in it.

No comments:

Post a Comment